Amazon.com Widgets
I’m not mad.  Really.

About Ramblings of a Hopeless Khowaga

Welcome to my Web site. My name is Chris, and I’ll be your host. I\'m an opinionated, snarky, gay academic with a predilection for the history, the Arab world, languages, photography, food, and music. I live in Austin, Texas. You can read more about me, learn 100 random things about me, and if you’re wondering what the heck a khowaga is, click here. Feel free to browse, read, and leave comments!

Archive: ‘Politics as Usual’



My Civic Duty

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

On Tuesday night, Ray and I decided to exercise our civic duty and went to vote.  Here in Texas, we have early voting, and in our county (which is, I’ve learned, purple on the political map — not as red as some would like it to be, and not as blue either) all early voting is done on electronic voting machines.

I’ve read the stories about the voting machines and the errors and whatnot, but the experience seemed to be error free.  This shouldn’t be confused with “it was easy.”  No, with only four voting machines, we waited in line for nearly 10 minutes, and by the time we left, the line extended out of the room where voting was being held, around the corner, and was starting to snake down the hall.

I had a whiplash moment when a woman in front of us asked if the print could be made larger because she has difficulty seeing.  “No,” said the perky, helpful volunteer, “but we have a magnifying sheet you can use.”  I don’t know whether the woman was able to finally read for herself because my turn came next and my back was to her, but while I was standing there, the volunteer seemed to be reading the screen to her.

Seriously–at however many thousand dollars a pop, you’d think that one of the things they could work into the voting machines is the ability to make the font larger and, I dunno, text to speech.  Where’s the ADA when you need them?

I grow weary of this political campaign and am desperate for it to end.  Yesterday, Sarah Palin went after Obama for being associates with Rashid Khalidi, a professor at Columbia who, according to CNN, is “a harsh critic of U.S. foreign policy toward Israel and has accused the country of ‘occupying’ Palestinian territories.”  Apparently CNN is so afraid of the neocons that they have to put “occupying” in quotes because there’s no consensus on this point?  Give me a break.

By the way, in case anyone missed it, al-Qaeda is endorsing McCain.

I’m ready for it to be over, one way or the other.  I know which way I’d prefer (in case it’s not obvious), but it’s been four years of ridiculousness on the campaign trail, and four years of ridiculousness in the White House.  Either way, it’s going to be a 50% reduction in the ridiculous factor.

Are you ready?  I know I am.

Post-Independence Day Ranting

Monday, July 7th, 2008

I’m writing this post out of some weird feeling of necessity, but I’m not actually sure what to write about.  I’ve been feeling a general sort of eighth-year-of-the-Bush-administration/too-hot-to-play-outside malaise of late.

Brian (Cheap Blue Guitar Brian, not UrbanBohemian Brian) has said what I wanted to say about Jesse Helms’ passing on Friday last – namely, us gay folk don’t do ourselves any good when we dance on the graves of our foes.  I think I said it when Falwell passed, and I’ll say it again about Jesse Helms: no, I didn’t like him and I’m pretty sure he would have hated me too, but celebrating his death is just wrong.

I don’t see a terribly large difference qualitatively between the headline in Towleroad “Ding Dong, Jesse Helms is Dead” and Rev. Phelps and his funereal ‘God Hates Fags and Dead American Soldiers’ campaign.  Celebrating death because you find the deceased personally distasteful is itself distasteful.

Friday, of course, was also Independence Day, which was celebrated with a cookout with some friends and a desperate hope that next Independence Day we’ll be able to celebrate both the anniversary of our country’s birth and our freedom from the neoconservative death grip on Washington.  The President has a 17% approval rating; Congress has a 13% approval rating.  For God’s sake, it’s time to start thinking in terms of common sense and not just in terms of Republicrat vs. Democlican.  Enough is enough, people!

In Egypt, they founded a whole political movement around the slogan “Kifaya” (“Enough!”)  Maybe it’s time we do that here.  Who’s with me?

I’ve already got an agenda item: The New York Times Magazine ran a profile of Rush Limbaugh this Sunday, which contains the following hypothetical platform for an “if you were elected president, what would your agenda be” Limbaugh administration:

  1. Open the continental shelf to drilling. Ditto the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
  2. Establish a 17 percent flat tax.
  3. Privatize Social Security.
  4. Give parents school vouchers to break the monopoly of public education.
  5. Revoke Jimmy Carter’s passport while he is out of the country.
  6. Abandon all government policies based on the hoax of man-made global warming.

“* Number 5 was a joke. I think.”

Let’s look at number 6 again. I already knew that Rush Limbaugh thought that global warming was being trumped up by the Democrats as an , but a hoax?  Seriously?  This is like people who don’t understand that a scientific theory (as in, “The Theory of Evolution”) means that it can’t be reproduced in a lab, but is otherwise pretty much evidential.

Yes, let’s declare global warming a hoax.  C’mon, dudes — FUCK THE PLANET!!  I’m sure Limbaugh and his Dittoheads would just love to live on a massive spaceliner with personal conveyances like humanity does in Wall-E.  (Great movie, by the way, you should see it.  Skip Hancock.)

And on that lovely note.  Have a happy Monday, everyone!  Take the reader poll if you haven’t already.

Jack be NIMBY, Jack be Quick …

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Hopefully, I can be forgiven for taking a gander at this morning’s Austin American-Statesman and wondering if, perhaps, the box on the corner had accidentally been filled instead with The Onion.  The lead headline this morning, “Smaller Wal-Mart planned,” seems awfully similar to some of the headlines I’ve seen in The Onion, such as “Most Children Strongly Opposed To Children’s Healthcare” or “A Statement Followed by a Question Separated by a Colon: An Effective Journalistic Technique?

The story is far less interesting, focusing on what may or may not be the outcome of a neighborhood battle that’s been waging at least since I moved here about the ever-resilient Wal-Mart company wanting to put a SuperCenter in the middle of a neighborhood whose residents clearly think it’s much nicer and high-class than it actually is, and protesting the same.

This is what happens in Austin.  Now, I should mention that in this case, I’m all for Wal-Mart being told to take a hike.  I don’t care for Wal-Mart on a basic ethical-bad fashion-ease of crap acquisition level, and if the neighbors of the new SuperCenter don’t want it, good for them.

On the other hand, the NIMBY (“not-in-my-back-yard”) phenomenon has also led to massive urban sprawl (nearly every development project that has been held up in Austin due to NIMBYing has wound up in the ‘burbs.  That’s how IKEA wound up two miles from my house – Austin wanted loads of restrictions, Round Rock wanted a big store to come and build so that they could justify annexing several hundred acres of land next to the freeway.  Guess where IKEA chose to build?

Interstate 35, the highway that Pat Robertson swears is going to start cleansing us of sin any moment now, is a mess and hasn’t been upgraded since the 1960s.  Why?  Because local environmentalists are concerned that if the highway is rebuilt, it will encourage more people to drive on it.  I have sat in stop-and-go traffic on I-35 in downtown Austin at 2 am, I’ve sat in traffic at noon on a Sunday, I’ve sat in traffic … well, pretty much at any given time of the day. I-35 literally needs to be blown up and started over. However, because of public opposition, the Austin council does what it always does: absolutely nothing.  And so the problem gets worse.

I should add here that the usual alternative offered is that we should be “encouraging public transportation.”  You’d think that for a city as green as Austin makes itself out to be that we’d have an awesome public transportation system.  You’d be wrong.  The system is so bad as to be almost non-existent.  After at least 10 years of quibbling, a (single) commuter rail line is going into service sometime this fall.  Not all of the stations will be open at first because some of them (you guessed it) are leaving an environmental footprint that’s too large, so construction has halted while lawsuits are filed to figure out why.  Also, the path the commuter line is taking doesn’t really follow the main commuter traffic flow – they’re building on existing rail lines.  Guess why.

I like the environment, I do.  That’s why I take the new toll road that zips me home so that I can spend 25 minutes less on the road burning fossil fuels. I know it’s not the most green option, but I don’t have another one — there’s no bus line to my suburb, and the new commuter rail line doesn’t come anywhere near me. If they could come up with another option that cost me less than the $50 a week I spend in gas, I’d be all for it.  But even if an option were proposed today (and as far as I know they’re not even thinking of one), it would be another ten years before work even started because of all of the hand-wringing.

By the way, if you think my attitude is bad, consider this: I’m a liberal.  I’m actually reasonably pro-environment, although after living in Austin I’m starting to be anti-environmentalist.  Closing down Austin and moving everyone somewhere else isn’t going to happen, so can we have some reason injected into the discussion?.  Think about how the conservative element who wants to know why the oil derreck in the middle of the UT campus isn’t actually producing oil anymore feels about this whole thing.

All I’m saying is that, for a city of 750,000, we should not be #2 on the list of the most traffic congested cities in the country.  We’re worse than Chicago, worse than New York, Washington DC, and Boston.  We’re worse than everyone in the country, except for Los Angeles.  Is that something to be proud of?  Aren’t we supposed to be setting an example?  Because so far, we’re not doing a very good job.

Open Response to Matt

Sunday, June 8th, 2008

There’s an interesting discussion going on over at Matterdays, and I found myself wanting to weigh in without taking over the comment section of his blog for my own big fat political rant.

This follows on the issue I brought up in my last post, namely that some supporters of Hillary Clinton find themselves unable or unwilling to support Barack Obama in the fall election and have instead decided to vote for John McCain.  I still stand by my assertion that the rift in the Democratic party is too raw at the moment, but that over the course of the remaining months between now and November a number of Democrats who’ve made this decision will change their minds.

This isn’t to call them wishy-washy or question the strength of their beliefs–after all, the day after Bush won the last election I was one of those people who swore up and down that I’d emigrate rather than spend another four years under Bush, and the best I’ve managed to do is spend an average of three to four weeks out of the country each year.  Things change, aches heal, and people change their minds.  I suspect that many will.  I also suspect that many won’t.

I should start off by saying what I like about John McCain.  It’s nothing specific.  It’s just that the prospect of a McCain presidency doesn’t fill me with dread the way that a Bush presidency has.  Part of this has to do with the fact that I believe that a McCain administration would actually be run to a large extent by John McCain, whereas I live under no illusion that George Bush has had very much to do with what has gone on for the past eight years.  McCain is his own man, and he has experience.

The reason, however, that I plan to vote for Barack Obama in November is that, in McCain, I see a lot of policies that I don’t agree with remaining the same.  McCain is a hawk, especially when it comes to the Middle East.  Given that I spend quite a lot of time in the Middle East, this worries me.  I don’t particularly think that we should sit down at the negotiating table with Iran until they’ve made some serious concessions, but I also think that suggesting that we need to bomb Iran-even in jest-is unproductive and harmful.

The notion that we need to be prepared to spend the next 100 years in Iraq is equally as harmful.  I’m firmly of the “we broke it, we must fix it” mindset, but that’s stating outright that we’re planning to annex the country.  It doesn’t go down easily in Baghdad, and it doesn’t go down easily with me either.

On the issue of gay rights, I don’t actually see a gay rights champion among any of the finalists in this campaign – Hillary included.  None of the final three supported gay marriage.  Obama supports the idea of civil unions and, at the risk of being labeled a self-hating homo, I can’t in all honesty argue for more.  I think gay marriage is an idea whose time has not yet come–50 years ago, people didn’t marry outside their church, for heavens sake!–and we’ve seen a lot of DOMAs enacted in hasty response.  Here in Texas we have two.  When it comes down to it, I expect Obama to bend less on this issue than McCain, but again I’m playing party lines.

Matt’s commenter says point blank that he doesn’t trust Obama.  I don’t have any reason to trust any politicians, period.  I don’t trust one more than the other.  When it comes right down to it, Obama is an unproven politician.  So was JFK.  In my mind, however, it’s a simple choice of the devil I know vs. the devil I don’t.  And, frankly?  I’ve seen what the devil I know is capable of, and I don’t like it.

In my heart of hearts, I believe that, while Obama may not be the savior his supporters claim he is (sorry, Will), he’s certainly not going to be worse than what we’ve had for the past eight years.  The mere fact that he recognizes the country is on the wrong path–and hasn’t been along for the ride and is now actively trying to pretend he hasn’t–is enough for me.

Fighting Dirty

Friday, June 6th, 2008

Matt beat me out of the starting gate on the righteous indignation front this morning with his post calling out the die-hard supporters of Hillary Clinton who have decided that the most constructive thing they can do now that she’s conceding the race to Barack Obama is to instead vote for John McCain.

I find this distressing on a number of levels — a lot of people are raising the banner of unspoken racism in the charge that “There’s just something about Obama that I don’t trust.”  There’s also that e-mail running about accusing Obama of being a “secret Muslim” (intriguing, given the whole fracas over Obama’s connection to his decidedly un-Muslim pastor), with the unspoken set of equally racist charges that implies–to whit that, by vent of being a secret Muslim, Obama is actually the leader of the Great Islamic Fifth Column who will reveal his true form once in office and make his first act to send the military into private homes and staple veils on everyone’s heads.  It’s amazing what some people believe is possible.

That whole brouhaha aside, I must raise the question: for the past eight years, we’ve had a President who thinks he’s God’s warrior, and look where that’s gotten us.  Even if Obama were secretly Muslim or the anti-Christ, as some have charged–could he really do that much worse that the current occupant of the White House?

Back to the split in the Democratic party.  It’s been a long campaign, and it’s not over, even if we’re feeling a resolution to a long, drawn out process that we all expected to end in February.  Despite the fact that the two fought a relatively clean battle themselves, their supporters have entrenched, and I understand that for the Hillary-ites, defeat is not easy.  But John McCain is an easy way out, not a noble sacrifice.

Hillary, for her part, isn’t helping much by making overtures for the vice-presidency.  If she continues to push the issue, she paints Obama into a corner: if he picks her, then he demonstrates that he’s weak and that she’s the more powerful politician on the ticket, even if she’s running in the Number 2 slot.  If he doesn’t pick her, he risks alienating her supporters even further.

For the record, I think that when it comes right down to it, the biggest danger is that Hillary’s supporters won’t vote for McCain – it’s that they’ll stay home in November and not vote for anyone.  And no self-respecting homo should vote for a Republican, <em>period</em>.  Not after the past 8 years.

I have to wonder whether a lot of this is just posturing in the wake of defeat — maybe, once the Obama-McCain race truly starts, Hillary supporters will be able to move on and support the Democratic party.  For the sake of our country–heck, for the rest of the world–I certainly hope so.  I don’t know if we can wait till 2012 for a change — if we keep going down the path we’re on, there may not be a 2012.

 

Blog Theme by LJP & SLR Lounge