Amazon.com Widgets
I’m not mad.  Really.

About Ramblings of a Hopeless Khowaga

Welcome to my Web site. My name is Chris, and I’ll be your host. I live in Austin, Texas, with my partner, Ray, and our child dog, Mocha. You can read more about me, learn 100 random things about me, and if you’re wondering what the heck a khowaga is, click here. Feel free to browse, read, and leave comments!

Tag: ‘about me’



Outrage

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

I’ll admit it: I didn’t vote yesterday.  It’s an off-year, and down here in Texas we only had 11 constitutional amendments to approve.  Not surprisingly, they were all approved.  That’s what always happens when the only thing on the ballot is a series of issues or amendments.  Apparently it’s now harder for the state to claim eminent domain, which, if I remember from my US Government class, is why Alexander Hamilton got into a duel with Martin Luther King, Jr., over box seats at the Houston Astrodome.

I’ll also admit that I was listening to the Glee soundtrack in the car this morning, so I didn’t find out about Maine until I got to work. At first, I just registered disappointment.  I mean, there was Prop 8 last year, and don’t let’s forget that Texas has banned marriage for the gays twice now.  (The first time, they forgot to make it clear that not only was gay marriage illegal here, but that we don’t recognize it if you get married somewhere that it is legal, so they up and did it again.)

I saw a lot of annoyed people on Facebook today complaining about Maine.  None of them are Mainers.  I don’t know anyone from Maine.  It has the dubious distinction of being one of the five states I’ve never been to (for the record: Vermont, New Hampshire, Minnesota, and North Dakota).  And, in all honesty, even though everyone says they’re disappointed in Maine or angry about Maine, they’re really only talking about that 53% “clear majority” of voters that pushed through the repeal.

So, I went on with my day, which consisted of being a ball of stress (as has every other day this week).  And I put Maine right out of my mind.

And then I saw this:

bangor

This would be a photo from the Bangor newspaper of people celebrating their victory last night. And I gotta tell you something–I’ve seen things that are offensive.  But this?  Man, this … just pissed me right the fuck off.

Let’s do an image analysis activity, here, shall we?

There are at least two people in this photo who aren’t old enough to vote.

Everyone in the photograph is white.

Several of them are overweight.  You know perfectly well that the nice lady hasn’t clapped this hard since Jimmy Joe’s fried chicken won the contest down to the state fair in Augusta.  (No, that’s not nice.  Remember what she’s spent the past several months saying about me and my ilk, please, and then shut up.)

And then we’re drawn to the lady kneeling.  She’s either overcome with emotion, or she’s praying, or both.

And I just have to ask: why?

What the hell is so wrong with us that she lost the ability to stand and has to grasp someone else’s hand for support?

And aren’t all of these people supposed to be leaving on the Rapture bus soon?  Why do they even care about the laws on this planet Earth??

Several Internet and blogger pals have decried the institutional failure here: whenever minority rights get put up to a vote by the majority, the minority loses.  The issue, of course, is that the majority refuses to recognize that gays and lesbians ARE a minority.  We’re just wrong.

I want someone to go to Congress and make these people put their money where their mouths are.  If marriage is so important, and must be protected, let’s protect it.  We need to ban divorce in these United States of America.

Furthermore, if it’s so true that children need both a mother and a father, we need to pass a bill in the Congress that will call for the removal of children from any household in which a mother and father (married, of course) are not present.  Daddy just died in the war?  Tough!  Mommy’s got a week to find a new husband or the kids go to foster care.

I know it sounds like I’m being flippant, but I’m being quite serious.  If we’re going to have all these moral values out there, someone needs to push to take them to their logical end.  If people can get divorced, and children live in homes with one parent, and none of these bleeding hearts out to “protect the family” will do anything about it … well, then what’s to stop me from marrying a hamster?

Time to take the gloves off.  And if that doesn’t work, we’re cancelling both Glee and Project Runway.  You just wait and see if we don’t.

Netiquette

Friday, May 8th, 2009

Today’s rant from Chris™ involves the arrival in my e-mail inbox of requests for money.

I’m not talking about those bogus “Nigerian” businessmen who send stupid messages like, “I am the wife of so-and-so.  My husband was beaten to death with badminton rackets after winning a game against the local military strongman/smoothie franchise owner.  I just happen to have $80 zillion that needs to be deposited somewhere, and your bank account is as good a place as, say, a Swiss bank account.  You just have to send me $1,000 first.  Whaddya say?”

I’m talking about legitimate requests for money from people that I actually know.

I am reminded, for example, of the time a few years ago that an e-mail arrived from an old college friend.  She was going a run in support of AIDS research and needed people to sponsor her.  While I’m all about supporting AIDS research, I support the cause directly through the mandatory voluntary charity program we have set up through payroll and … the message asking for sponsorship was the first communication I’d had from her in nearly five years.  I had no idea where she was living, what she was doing in her life, and, frankly, was pretty sure she had the same amount of information about me.

Contrary to feeling honored to be part of an important process, I felt kind of like she’d sent a broadband message to her entire address book (which is, I’m sure, what she actually did).  Etiquette would normally dictate a semi-personal follow up directed individually to me that would sort of soothe that rough patch over.  Such a message didn’t come.  I did get routine messages of increasing frequency detailing the amount of money she still needed to raise, but … I actually felt a little insulted.

I didn’t donate, and, as callous as it may sound, I don’t feel that guilty about it.  Just one message to me individually would have swung my opinion.  Just one.

The organization that I went to Saudi Arabia with in 2005 sends me requests for money so frequently that I have the address set to filter directly into my junk mail folder.  I know they’re teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, but knowing the guy in charge, I’m not sure that would be a bad thing.

I just got another one from a colleague who works for a non-profit.  Their funding has been cut this year, and the doyenne of this particular organization sent a message to “twenty select friends” asking them to contribute $1,000 each to help her make up the shortfall.  While I like this woman personally, and I think the work that she does is important, I have issues with the way she does it.  Also, and more importantly, I don’t have $1,000 laying around that I can donate.

Her message was, at least individually addressed, but … I’m not a huge fan of requests like these.  What if the shortfall continues next year?  If I manage to find money somewhere (I could, theoretically, use one of my work accounts and buy an institutional membership in her organization), am I going to be expected to contribute next year?  I’m not sure I want to establish that precedent.  Provide me with a more solvent business plan and I’ll consider it.

I realize this all goes to make me sound like a stingy bastard, and perhaps I am.  I’m also an underpaid public servant whose savings account balance can’t ever seem to hit four digits.  If you want money from me, you need to make a good case for it.

What say you all?

Careful what you wish for

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

The other night, I had one of those “be careful what you wish for” moments. At this point, I suppose there’s no denying that I’m an Internet addict. I’m constantly checking my e-mail (when it works — which it hasn’t been lately — I can even get it on my phone), and whenever we pull into a hotel for the night, I pull out the laptop to see if there’s an Internet connection I can use somewhere. Preferably one I don’t have to pay for.

This recent trip to the Rio Grande Valley was no exception. The hotel in Edinburg was annoying–you actually had to plug your computer into an Ethernet cable. What Luddites!

When I got to Laredo, I was happy to see a wireless connection. I checked my e-mail and then made the usual round of the Web sites I check for updates on an obsessive basis: my blog stats, Facebook, and flickr. The blog stats were unimpressive (not terribly surprising, given that I hadn’t posted anything for a while). Facebook was full of the usual crap: friend requests I’m not sure I want to accept, invitations to events I don’t plan to go to (lately I’ve been invited to an inordinate number of things taking place–usually the next day–in Cairo), and invitations to accept pieces of flair, little fish for my pond, and other random things. (Note to Facebookers: I reject all of these. You can send them if you like, but don’t be insulted if I don’t send them back.)

When I got to flickr, however, there was an update. Two of my photos had been favorited! This makes me happy (for the un-flickr-initiated, that’s what happens when someone decides they really like one of your photos: they can tag it as one of their favorites, which means that they can then access it from their own account any time they want).

Then I saw who had done the favoriting.

I’m sorry to do the bad story teller thing here, but I’m not going to publicly identify the individual in question. I know for a fact that he trolls the Internet looking for people who mention him, the organization he works for, and the Web site that he runs, and I don’t want to do him the service of sending traffic his way, nor do I particularly want him or his minions reading my blog.

What I will tell you is that, in the field I work for, this guy is kind of in the Fred Phelps role. Since 9/11, he’s been one of a handful of neo-conservative nutjobs who’ve decided to use the atmosphere of paranoia, patriotism, and the general political climate of the Bush administration to go after academia. He’s one of those people who thinks that the best way to make sure that university students aren’t being indoctrinated by America-hating liberals is to mandate “balance” in the classroom through legislation. He’s even established an organization dedicated to “improving” my field of study by “restoring balance.” The fact that said organization has, in the five years it’s been operating, never once criticized anyone for being too supportive of his viewpoint (and, trust me, there are plenty of people out there who are) is, of course, completely irrelevant.

For a while, there, they managed to get people in Congress to listen. Among the many things they wanted to do was appoint a “supervisory committee” (which he and his friends expected to be appointed to run) that, when they proposed the idea, would have had the power to go through individual course syllabi and suggest revisions. When nearly every university that receives funding under the federal program in question basically told Congress that they’d rather not accept any more funding than accept such oversight — and, by the way, is this even Constitutional?–things went through various forms of revision until the entire committee idea was dropped altogether. Nowadays, of course, if anyone even brings up this little historical tidbit, it’s because we’re all “hysterical.”

So, I have to admit that when I saw that this particular individual had seen my flickr account and favorited a couple of my photos, my palms got sweaty. I immediately went to my profile. Dear God, I thought, what can he find out about me? Has he seen my blog?

I mentioned this to a couple of friends, and got some sympathetic noises, and I went to bed.

When I woke up in the morning, I did the internet obsession thing again … and then I noticed that, over the course of the night, he had un-favorited my photos.

And I was strangely insulted. So, what, are my photos not good enough for you? Are they too liberal? They’re good photos! Really. (OK, technically, they’re photos of photos hanging in a museum somewhere. Regardless, I did a lot of work touching them up.)

And then I came to the conclusion that I’ve always known was lurking just underneath the surface somewhere: I need help.

… happy Thursday?

Lifestyles of the Straight and Hopeless

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

I realize that I neglected, in my not-terribly-triumphant announcement that I am returning to blogging more frequently, that I neglected to provide any details about Saturday evening.

Every so often, when I’m out in public, I observe the mating habits of that most intriguing of creatures, homo sapiensis heterosexualis, and I wonder–sometimes to myself, sometimes aloud–how it is that our species has managed to propagate itself as long as it has, given that, well, straight boys are just completely inept. Honestly. The survival of mankind as we know it depends on this??

I should preface this by acknowledging that Ray made what is not an entirely inaccurate observation about me. When I’m out in public, and I see someone who looks young, I tend to comment that they’re “twelve!” Ray gently pointed out that it’s not that they’re getting younger, it’s that I’m getting older. I prefer to think that it’s both, but whatever.

We started Valentine’s Day evening at a local wine bar, Cork and Company, where we had a couple of glasses of wine and some cheese. It was here that I had my first great revelation of the evening: I don’t know anywhere near enough lesbians. I like lesbians. In fact, it’s entirely possible that I enjoy the company of lesbians more than I enjoy the company of many gay men. We were seated at the bar (stupid me: it hadn’t occurred to me to make reservations at the bar that I planned to go to before dinner–this is why I hate Valentine’s Day!) next to a pair of lesbians. I don’t know if they were a couple or not, but they were a hoot to watch. They kept the alcohol coming, and they were no-nonsense, and god help the meandering soul who got a little too close to their space. They even managed to get the bartender to watch their seats for them while they went outside to smoke (Austin’s starting to make California look pro-tobacco).

On the other side of us was a young straight couple (me: “He’s twelve!” Ray: “He’s got three wine glasses in front of him. He’s clearly over 21.” Me: “He can’t possibly be shaving.” Ray: “You do know that he’s two feet away from you and can probably hear every word you’re saying, right?”). In all honesty, these were straight people who were significantly less inept than the others I observed later. She had on a nice dress; he was wearing a suit, and they seemed to be engaging each other in some conversation that prevented him from hearing (or at least acknowledging) the bitterly aging queen sitting next to them.

Then we strolled off to dinner. I had managed to secure late reservations at a Mediterranean restaurant called Taverna. They have a sister branch in Dallas that I’m convinced that I’ve been to, which is more Greek in style. The one in Austin is decidedly Italian. I kind of want to try the one in Houston just to see if it’s Lebanese.

Anyway, Taverna isn’t the cheapest place in town — it’s midrange, and I knew it because when I was spending a lot of Fulbright’s money last summer, I took a group of twenty there for dinner and earned a few frequent flier miles for it. I recalled that we enjoyed the food, and I thought it might be a nice place on Valentine’s Day.

Dirty business first: Ray had the veal parmagiana, I had butternut squash risotto with sea scallops. They were both good. Moving on.

There was another (presumably) gay couple sitting next to us. We decided that we were cuter than they were, and so that was that.

At my eleven o’clock, there was a young Latino couple. (Me: “They’re twelve!” Ray: “They’re not twelve. They have drinks.” Me: “They’re drinking soda.”) He was in a shirt and tie (no jacket), and a pair of loafers that had seen better days. He was slouched so far down in his seat that it was a wonder that he didn’t have to put his plate in his lap in order to eat. She was dolled up in a cute dress. I don’t know what the story was, but I tend to form judgments when, for example, it’s Valentine’s Day and the waiter hands the check to the woman and she pays. That’s just not right.

About halfway through the meal, another couple came in and sat at my nine o’clock. She was wearing a gray dress and had clearly spent hours getting ready. He clearly had not. He was wearing an untucked shirt over a paid of jeans and black athletic shoes. If I were her, I’d have left his sorry ass standing at the door. He spent the whole meal leering at her as if he was just going through the motions so that he could get to the part later where they have sex. Assuming that she didn’t dump him after dinner.

Which, of course, leads to the other thing I find weird about Valentine’s Day. You’re supposed to get dressed up, go out, eat a lot, have dessert, and drinks, and then … who still feels sexy after that? I felt kind of bloated.

But still. Every time I’m out in a formal setting, I tend to look at the straight couples of whom society approves, and I wonder … “How in the name of God have we not died out yet?” Because sometimes … it just doesn’t make that much sense.

I’ve been Memed

Saturday, July 21st, 2007

Shindo tagged me for a one of these meme things. Thanks for the shout out, but next time can we do one of those creative memes? I’ve already done the big old list of 100 things about me, and now I gotta figure out 8 more interesting things I haven’t mentioned before? Narf!

OK, here we go:

  1. I have to post these rules before I give you the facts.
  2. Each player starts with eight random facts/habits about themselves.
  3. People who are tagged need to write their own blog about their eight things and post these rules.
  4. At the end of your blog, you need to choose eight people to get tagged and list their names.
  5. Don’t forget to leave them a comment telling them they’re tagged, and to read your blog.

All right, let’s see.

1. In recent years, I have developed a bizarre tendency to talk, yell, scream, or make other very loud noises in my sleep. Last night, for example, I had a dream in which a large swarm of bees descended upon my head and I screamed – out loud – and woke up Ray. I have also been known to have stress dreams in which I chew out other people using language that would make my mother’s hair curl … also out loud.

2. I have two residual childhood fears that I have never quite gotten over: stinging insects (see: above) and the idea that somehow I’m going to die in a tornado. I am also terrified of death and have several other phobias that are derivatives of that, including a comes-and-goes fear of heights and a fear of flying.

3. I’m bad with money. Like, really, really, really bad. I’ve had to resort to extreme measures to get myself out of debt a couple of times. As hunky/dorky as that guy in the Free Credit Report commercials is, I’m going to wait a while before I take him up on that offer because I’d really rather not know how badly I’ve fucked myself over.

4. I’m insecure – despite years of therapy, I do have a deep-seated need for people to think good of me. I’m not as bad about this as I used to be (the SSRIs help), but it’s still there. I am, however, aware of the problem, so I think that’s at least a good step in the right direction.

5. I am loyal as a friend and have remained in several friendships far longer than I should have done for that reason. I don’t like to let people down — this is probably a side effect of #4.

6. On the other hand, once I’ve decided I don’t like you, you’re fucked. In rare circumstances (yes, Ray, you know which one I’m talking about), I can maintain a facade after that point has been reached – usually when it’s someone I have to work with or there are other mitigating circumstances. Otherwise, I have a problem hiding my impatience and irritation when interacting with people I don’t like.

7. I have an excellent sense of direction. I can give directions to places in cities I’ve visited once many years ago, and usually know where I am at any given moment. When I’m disoriented, it’s very upsetting to me.

8. Like the majority of gay blogs that I do read, and unlike a goodly number of them out there, I see no particular reason to discuss intimate details of my love life online. The sheer number of guys who feel the need to disclose whether they’re a top or bottom to an audience that doesn’t really need that information (and it’s funny how they’re always tops … ) astounds me. “Yes, but can you write using proper grammar??”

However, if you must know, the answer is here in inviso-text: I prefer to be on the left. Seriously, did you not read what I just wrote??

Okey doke, I’m done. Oh, crap, I have to pass this on … to eight bloggers?? I don’t know eight bloggers. Not to mention Shindo put a good dent in the list of people I would have chosen.

OK, let’s see: Will, Daniel, and … who wants to get tagged? E-mail me if you’re interested …

 

Blog Theme by LJP & SLR Lounge