Amazon.com Widgets
I’m not mad.  Really.

About Ramblings of a Hopeless Khowaga

Welcome to my Web site. My name is Chris, and I’ll be your host. I\'m an opinionated, snarky, gay academic with a predilection for the history, the Arab world, languages, photography, food, and music. I live in Austin, Texas. You can read more about me, learn 100 random things about me, and if you’re wondering what the heck a khowaga is, click here. Feel free to browse, read, and leave comments!

Tag: ‘bbc’



Free

Wednesday, July 4th, 2007

Alan Johnston is free.

I’m doing something a bit weird and starting off a post on holiday that celebrates American independence by pointing out that a British reporter held in captivity for 114 days has been freed … thanks to the concerted efforts of Hamas, an organization (no longer a government) that we consider to be terrorists — and with good reason. There was an interesting piece on NPR yesterday about how much safer Gazans now feel since Hamas ran Fatah out of the strip. Of course, one could also point out security is bound to increase any time fighting stops, regardless of who actually wins. After all, Iraq under Saddam was one safe place. Places where you get executed for shoplifting generally are.

Hopefully Gilad Shalit is next and then everyone can move on from this whole sorry mess.

But it seems rather in the spirit of liberty that a number of parties managed to work together — regardless of how distasteful they might find one another — toward a common cause that has, at its core, a concern for human dignity.

I say this, of course, because this particular Fourth of July in the United States it is very difficult to heed our own president’s words as indicative of anything other than what the president of the United States thinks personally. I have long ago rejected the idea that the president represents anyone other than himself and the interest groups that support him regardless of how far off the path of good governance he strays.

In a sign of how far afield we’ve gotten, I read an editorial this morning in the Austin American-Statesman, a newspaper that tends to be at editorial odds with the community that makes up its core audience (the Statesman is conservative, Austin is liberal). What surprised me about it is — other than the fact that all of its examples of hope for change use Republicans — that there’s really nothing I disagree with. In fact, I agree with just about all of it, and rather strongly.

Among the choice highlights:

Americans’ faith and trust in their government is ridiculously low. President Bush has approval ratings around 30 percent in most polls, and Congress fares even worse, with a 25 percent approval rating. They clearly earned their scores.

There are myriad reasons: the awful, grinding war in Iraq; endless partisan bickering in Washington; a stagnant political process that seems to get nothing important done; and a government that views the public with disdain.

What makes a democracy work is transparency, accountability and an informed public. Washington’s disregard for Americans’ rights, open government and responsible governance makes for a rather sunless celebration of American independence today.

I keep looking at the calendar and thinking that in a year and a half, this will all be over. But will it?

Here’s an idea: what if, this fourth of July, we all collectively decide that this November and next, we’re going to use our votes at the ballot box to remind those in charge that they work for us, not the other way around (and just saying you serve the American people over and over doesn’t count).

What if we throw an election and everyone comes? What if we restore power to the people? After all, isn’t that what this holiday is supposed to be about?

Random Round-Up

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

I saw a few news items that made me think/laugh/cry/roll my eyes, so I collected them all and put them here in a handy concise format for you. Here goes:

Egypt’s Dr. Ruth: Muslims Need More Sex
I love this article: an overeducated housewife in Cairo has become the Arab world’s first self-styled ‘sexologist,’ using passages from the Qur’an to tell men they gotta give their women more lovin’. Her television show — three years in the making — is one of the most popular programs on Egyptian TV and is spreading throughout the Arab world.

My favorite bit: “… for the men she has some blunt advice: ‘You have to have foreplay with your wife and you have to have sex with her frequently, not just when you want to.’” Tough words for a culture that likes its men manly and its women womanly, especially from a veiled lady quoting the Qur’an. Take that, Osama!

Could you imagine a sex show on one of the Christian networks in the US? (“Now, honey, when your husband wants it, you just gotta lie back and think of Jesus and how he suffered.”)

Where did Trinny and Susannah Go?
I caught one of the new episodes of BBC’s What Not to Wear last night, and … who the hell is that? Where did Trinny and Susannah go? I like Trinny and Susannah … I don’t like these two new ladies on the show. Ugh. Not. At. All.


It’s funny because it’s true.

I’m so irritated with the Democrats — yes, that’s right, you heard me. I’m a liburl, I’m a Democrat, and I really just want to bonk Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid’s heads together. After bitching nonstop for SIX YEARS about how the Bush administration is forging ahead without taking the time to consider what they’re doing, the Democrats are doing the EXACT SAME THING. Apparently because Pelosi and Reid think that we can fix Iraq and get out in six months, that makes it so. Hmm. I wonder how much research went into that discovery.

Hey, guys? Here’s a hint: ask the Iraqis. You remember them? The ones we’re supposedly there to help? Is any of this ringing a bell? Any of it? … I didn’t think so …

Ugh. Politicians!! Impeach them all, I say.

The Dow went over 13,000
I know that people are, like, creaming their pants over this, but the dollar almost simultaneously hit a 2-year low against the Euro which means I still can’t afford to go to Europe on vacation, AND gas is now projected to hit $4 a gallon this summer, so explain to me why this is such a big deal? Is it because economists otherwise never get to have sex?

The Last Word
Thanks to the latest scientific research, I now know for sure that my dog loves me.

Ray and I are, naturally, now going to start arguing over who the dog loves more …

It’s Thursday. I hope you’re having a good one, wherever you are.

BBC: Man Cuts Off Own Penis in a Restaurant

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007

The story sorta speaks for itself.

There are other ways to protest lousy service, though…

The Importance of Public Participation

Sunday, November 5th, 2006

I tend to read The New York Times on a pretty regular basis, mostly in the online form because I’m not rich enough to pay $1 each day for the privilege of reading about what’s going on in a city 1,200 miles away.

The local Austin paper (the Austin American-Statesman) is a nice example of what cow chips look like in print. Its editorial staff is notoriously out of touch with local opinions: for example, they have once again endorsed Governor Rick Perry for re-election, even though Travis County usually votes against him.

Since the rest of the paper is fluff pieces cobbled from the newswires of other units owned by the same media conglomerate, I am generally forced to look elsewhere if, say, I want to know what’s going on in the rest of the world. There’s a lot of NYT in my world and a lot of BBC, and every so often, just for a laugh, I’ll turn on Al-Jazeera, which isn’t any better than most of the English language news-channels (it’s skewed just as badly in the opposite direction), but their sense of the melodramatic strikes me as humorous.

Where this is all going is that most of the media outlets — the ones that have taken a break from Ted Haggard, Saddam Hussein, and prediction’s about what’s going to happen next on Lost — are focused on what’s going to happen on Tuesday.

In case you’ve been living under a rock, Tuesday is the midterm election in the United States, and it’s the chance for the American people to make up for their zombie-esque performance in the 2002 and 2004 elections by expressing their discontent with the current administration where it hurts: at the ballot box.

As I mentioned the other day, Texas is in no danger of joining the blue state list any time soon. I tend to joke that since I live in one of the suburbs, across the county line from liberal Austin, that I and my partner comprise the entire Williamson County Democratic Party. My joke got an unpleasant reinforcement when I went to cast my ballot in early voting (here in Texas, we can vote at any point two weeks prior to Election Day, with the added bonus that we don’t have to do it at our assigned precinct’s polling station). Even though I checked off the straight-party box on the ballot, I still had to fill in a number of holes where there wasn’t a Democrat running: Republican or Libertarian? Republican or Libertarian? I tend to go with the Libertarians, since they tend not to be in favor of banning stuff, but this is Texas, so one never knows.

Anyway. For those of you out there still trying to make up your mind about what to do on Tuesday, let me offer some choice excerpts from a biting editorial in today’s New York Times: “The Difference Two Years Made:”

… [T]he Republican majority that has run the House — and for the most part, the Senate — during President Bush’s tenure has done a terrible job on the basics. Its tax-cutting-above-all-else has wrecked the budget, hobbled the middle class and endangered the long-term economy. It has refused to face up to global warming and done pathetically little about the country’s dependence on foreign oil.

For us, the breaking point came over the Republicans’ attempt to undermine the fundamental checks and balances that have safeguarded American democracy since its inception. The fact that the White House, House and Senate are all controlled by one party is not a threat to the balance of powers, as long as everyone understands the roles assigned to each by the Constitution. But over the past two years, the White House has made it clear that it claims sweeping powers that go well beyond any acceptable limits. Rather than doing their duty to curb these excesses, the Congressional Republicans have dedicated themselves to removing restraints on the president’s ability to do whatever he wants. To paraphrase Tom DeLay, the Republicans feel you don’t need to have oversight hearings if your party is in control of everything.

This election is indeed about George W. Bush — and the Congressional majority’s insistence on protecting him from the consequences of his mistakes and misdeeds. Mr. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and proceeded to govern as if he had an enormous mandate. After he actually beat his opponent in 2004, he announced he now had real political capital and intended to spend it. We have seen the results. It is frightening to contemplate the new excesses he could concoct if he woke up next Wednesday and found that his party had maintained its hold on the House and Senate.

If you’re tired of the way this country is headed, get out and register your disapproval on Tuesday. If you like where this country is headed, get out and register your approval on Tuesday. Either way, get off your ass and vote.

Tags: , , , , , ,

 

Blog Theme by LJP & SLR Lounge