Amazon.com Widgets
I’m not mad.  Really.

About Ramblings of a Hopeless Khowaga

Welcome to my Web site. My name is Chris, and I’ll be your host. I\'m an opinionated, snarky, gay academic with a predilection for the history, the Arab world, languages, photography, food, and music. I live in Austin, Texas. You can read more about me, learn 100 random things about me, and if you’re wondering what the heck a khowaga is, click here. Feel free to browse, read, and leave comments!

Tag: ‘iraq’



A wish for peace that works

Wednesday, December 12th, 2007

Well, it’s December. It’s that time of year when we all get together and make nice-nice and celebrate the [symbolic] birth of our Lord and Savior (if you’re Christian), the prophet ‘Issa bin Maryam (if you’re Muslim), that dude everyone uses to justify being nasty to people (if you’re just about anyone else) and wish people peace and love by shooting them in malls in Nebraska, blowing up car bombs in Algiers and Beirut, and talking about maybe eventually thinking about the possibility of beginning negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians.

And it seems that His Imperial Eminence the Pope has announced that gay marriage is an obstacle to world peace. According to the Vatican, and I quote:

“Presenting the nuclear family as the ‘first and indispensable teacher of peace’ and the ‘primary agency of peace,’ the 15-page document links sexual and medical ethics to international relations. ‘Everything that serves to weaken the family based on the marriage of a man and woman, everything that directly or indirectly stands in the way of its openness to the responsible acceptance of new life … constitutes an objective obstacle on the road to peace,’ Benedict writes.”

As someone who works in Middle Eastern Studies, I must admit to being torn here. I’m so used to reading about how Muslims are out to destroy the universe that I keep forgetting that it’s really the gays who are hell bent on bringing Western civilization to an end. Thank heaven Mike Huckabee is there to remind me.

And if you’re gay and Muslim: RUN!!!!!!

I’ve read a lot of poppycock in my day on both topics (no, Virginia, Muslims are not hiding under your bed and waiting for you to fall asleep so that they can staple a hijab on your head. Really), but I would like to respond to the pope’s message with the following well-reasoned and eloquent answer:

Are you fucking kidding me with this shit?

Seriously. India and Pakistan got nukes pointed at each other. The Taliban keep coming back in Afghanistan, despite the best attempts of spin doctors between here and Kabul to convince us that we’re “winning.” Iran might be after nuclear weapons, or they might not — it’s pretty obvious we don’t actually know. Lebanon is on the verge of disintegrating (again). Iraq has disintegrated, and we’re trying to put it back together. Al-Qaeda is blowing up office buildings in Algeria. AIDS is still going to kill a third of Africa. The ice caps are melting faster than we originally thought, and yet we’re still having a debate about whether or not global warming is real or imagined. There’s a world financial crisis triggered by something called the “sub-prime mortgage market” that I don’t actually understand, I just know that I spent a ridiculous amount of money in Canada because apparently the American dollar isn’t worth the cloth it’s printed on (and yes, American dollars are printed on cloth, not paper. Look it up.)

But, no, clearly what’s causing all of this — even all that stuff going on in countries where they don’t like gays (which are just about all the ones I’ve mentioned, ‘cept Canada)–is that gay people can’t get married. Thanks so much for the clarification.

This, for the record, is one of the many, many reasons why I lost my respect for organized religion a long time ago. If it sounds like groupthink and it quacks like groupthink, it’s groupthink. If you ask me, organized religion is the biggest threat to world peace we have. If God is a formless being who lives on another dimension — why’s the pope so rich, exactly?

It’s too bad we can’t just get along because we’re all human and embrace our differences rather than reviling each other over them. Once we take the fear out of the “other,” we understand ourselves better.

So, that’s what I want for Christmas: a peace that works. Who’s with me?

The Case for Enlightened Despotism

Wednesday, July 11th, 2007

Where’s Catherine the Great when you need her?

I have read this morning two articles that make me sigh with frustration at the level of ridiculousness our national political landscape has descended to.

First is a recap of testimony offered by former Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona before Congress, in which he describes the political pressure placed on him by members of the Bush administration in an effort to weaken or suppress public health reports in order to support the administration’s position on various issues. Among the various complaints Carmona offers are that he was from testifying about the dangers of second hand cigarette smoke; that he was forbidden to attend the Special Olympics specifically because ‘a certain family’ [read: the Kennedys] is a big supporter of the organization; and that at one high-level meeting he was invited to attend it was decided that global warming is a liberal red herring and that it would not be an issue of importance to the sitting president.

It’s worth noting that the current nominee is on record as stating that homosexual sex is unnatural and unhealthy. Because that’s not an opinion influenced by religion or politics.

The second article is an Op-Ed by the New York Times’ Readers Representative in which he, correctly, points out that the administration has propagated the notion, swallowed wholesale by the media –including his own newspaper (and, I would add, Congress) — that ‘al-Qaeda’ is at the center of the insurgency in Iraq. While there is an al-Qaeda involved in the insurgency, it is worth noting that al-Qaeda in Iraq (as it is properly known) is not the same al-Qaeda responsible for the planning and execution of the 1998 Embassy bombings in East Africa, nor the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In fact, al-Qaeda in Iraq wasn’t even formed until 2003, and while they have sworn allegiance to Osama bin Laden, it is almost certain that he is not actually connected to the group’s operations.

The article goes on to offer out another key point: it is simplistic to the point of inaccuracy to suggest that al-Qaeda in Iraq is at the center of the insurgency or even in a controlling role. There are, by most conservative estimates, at least thirty some groups involved, many of whom are diametrically opposed to position and endgame advocated by al-Qaeda in Iraq. The reason this is important is because the sloppy language used by the administration, Congress, and the media offers a false sense of simplicity: there is one common set of goals to the insurgency, driven in large part by al-Qaeda in Iraq — hence once al-Qaeda in Iraq is defeated, the insurgency will fail. It also continues to propagate the myth that somehow the fighting in Iraq will further retribution for 9/11.

Sadly, while I would love to make this all the President’s fault, I can’t. I cannot begin to express how disappointed I have been with the Democrats since they took over Congress. The sheer determination to tie troop levels and military action in Iraq to poll ratings and politics here is not only deplorable, it’s the exact same thing the Bush administration was doing prior to the November election. Where, I wonder, is the common sense in any of this? I found myself startled to realize that I might actually agree with the president about something this morning as I heard yet another plea from Bush in which he asked for patience for General Petraeus’ report in September — right up until I realized that his motivation is about both trying to gain some sort of brownie points by hoping fervently that the as-yet ineffective troop surge will have noticeable results between now and then, and that doing otherwise would be a sign of weakness to the Democrats. No one’s actually thinking about what will win the war — no one except the military brass on the ground in Iraq, and the administration certainly isn’t going to leave such important election-winning decisions to them.

Our government prefers to fight each other than do anything important. Our president lives in a fantasy world where science can be re-interpreted as a political issue. Iraqis keep dying, and so do the troops we sent over there to fight a war the people issuing the orders either don’t understand or don’t care that they don’t understand — as long as the poll numbers don’t fall further.

Who loses? We do, dear readers. Our friends, neighbors, sons and daughters who might get drafted to fight a war abroad that’s being driven by our own domestic politics. The Iraqis.

So, I repeat: where’s a good enlightened despot to foster learning, science, and cultural production when you need one?

On The Road, or, Learning the Art of Travel

Thursday, July 5th, 2007

Note: A piece on NPR that I heard while driving home caused me to remember an incident I haven’t thought about in a long time. The piece was about the 50th anniversary of Jack Kerouac’s On The Road, one of the definitive travel memoirs, and it got me thinking about the difference between being somewhere and actually experiencing it.

It wasn’t that I didn’t see the young man, it was that I really wasn’t paying attention to him until he blended out of the crowd of similarly attired young men milling about and started speaking to me. I was on my way nowhere in particular, but I was moving quickly and with purpose because I wasn’t at ease, neither with being where I was, nor in my own skin. But that’s another story.

It was a typical August afternoon in Amman: hot, dry, sunny and clear. It was the end of the workday and traffic was beginning to snarl throughout the Jordanian capital, which is spread out across miles over hills that offer unexpected vistas of low, white, limestone block housing and the occasional radio and television transmission tower.

I was new at this — at all of this. I was twenty years old and beginning to appreciate the fact that I was completely out of my element. I had landed in Cairo barely a week earlier and left the chaos of Egypt behind to see as much of the world as possible before I had to be back for the beginning of the semester. Amman was my second stop, and a welcome relief from the sweltering heat in Aqaba, the port city where I’d arrived by boat a few days earlier. Even by Jordan-in-the-summer standards, Aqaba was suffering from a heat wave, with the temperature refusing to dip below 100 degrees even after midnight.

Amman, in the hills, was cooler – in the 80s – and a pleasant enough town to walk around. And walk I did, whenever I finished my sightseeing for the day and got bored of the hotel room that was barely large enough for the bed. I walked here and there, up and down hills, seeing but not really seeing anything — something I’ve come to appreciate over the years.

The culmination of my traveling-without-seeing experience came not the first day in Amman, nor the second. I was out for one of my afternoon walks through the part of town where I was staying, the cushy Sheisani district. I had found myself pulled by mere curiosity toward the Housing Bank Centre, a cross between a modernist interpretation of a ziggurat and the Hanging Gardens of Bablylon — in other words, a stepped skyscraper with lots of plants hanging over its various balconies.

The Housing Bank Centre complex was what we call a multi-use space, an office building with a shopping mall at its base. I wandered through the area and discovered that the complex was far more interesting from the outside than it was on the inside, and I quickly bored of being there and headed for the door.

It was outside that the young man stopped me and asked me the oddest question. “Can you get me inside?”

Over the duration of the first week that I had spent in the Middle East, I had quickly discovered that the two years of Arabic that I had taken at my university in Washington, DC, had not prepared me in the slightest for communicating with anyone in the Arab world, so our communication was awkward at best.

“Um, you can go inside right there,” I said, pointing to the door I had just come out of, while trying at the same time to determine if the guy seemed a little out of it.

“No, I need to go there,” he said, pointing to a different door. “They won’t let me in.”

I followed his finger to the other side of the building, and realized that he was pointing to the Forte Grande Amman, which was in the same complex.

“You want to go in the hotel?” I asked, still confused.

“Yes,” he said.

“Why … why can’t you just go in the hotel?”

“I want to go to Israel,” he said simply.

I looked back at the hotel, and then back at the young man. He was about my own age, I guessed, and he was looking at me with a level of expectancy that made me completely uncomfortable.

It’s also worth pointing out that this was 1995. Jordan and Israel had signed a peace treaty barely ten months earlier, and the respective embassies in both countries were still looking for permanent housing. The Israeli diplomatic corps in Jordan had rented out a floor of the Forte Grande Hotel in Amman and was using it as a makeshift embassy while searching for more permanent accommodations. They weren’t having much luck — at the time, sixty per cent of Jordan’s population was of Palestinian origin and no one wanted to lease space to the Israelis.

I understood. “Do you have to go to the Embassy? I mean, with the treaty, you can just go across to Israel, can’t you?”

“No,” he said simply. “I’m from Iraq.”

“And you want to go to Israel?” I asked. This guy was crazy — Iraq was still technically in a state of war with Israel. They’d never let him in — he didn’t have a chance in hell.

“Yes,” he said.

Why?” I asked.

He shrugged. “To work.”

I backed away slowly. “I’m sorry,” I said, “I’m not staying at this hotel, and they probably won’t let me in either.” As I spoke, I backed away even further and, having finished my utterly weak excuse, I turned and walked away. Down by the corner, I glanced back to see the young man, hands still in pockets, shoulders slumped, waiting for some other Western-looking person to walk by so that he could try to gain entry to the Israeli embassy.

In my mind I had convinced myself that the young man was up to no good, that he was going to go try to attack the embassy, or that he was going to go to Israel for the purpose of joining the Palestinian resistance. I had no idea at the time that Israel is one of the top destinations for human trafficking, and that this young man was probably one of hundreds — thousands — of migrant workers hoping to gain employment in Israel’s construction sector, which was booming after the influx of nearly a million Russian Jews. After five years of sanctions, he had probably fled his country so that he could find some sort of gainful employment and send money home to support his family.

I guess all of this, of course, because I don’t know any of this for sure. I don’t know this because I turned and walked away. Even within the following year, I would find myself feeling ashamed and regretting my decision to turn around and leave him standing there on the street. I should have talked to him, found out his story. And then I should have tried to get him into the hotel. It wouldn’t have worked, but I should have tried.

I wonder whatever happened to him. I wonder if he ever made it to Israel, or if he became one of the millions of Iraqi refugees living in Jordan, barely scraping by. I’ll never find out. But every so often, I remember that interaction, and I remember how bad I felt about it afterwards. I’ve been lots of places, and I’ve seen lots of things, but that young man taught me something. I’ve learned to listen to people when they talk to me, because those are the experiences that I remember the most.

And I’ll never get the chance to tell him that.

It’s funny ‘cos it’s true …

Thursday, May 17th, 2007

The Axis of Uh-Oh: When the going gets tough, a tough America sometimes has to turn to evil to fight evil. Onward to victory of some sort … or another … !

Click the image to watch the animation:

axis-of-uhoh.jpg

Thanks to 3arabawy for the nod…

Where was democracy marching, exactly?

Wednesday, March 14th, 2007

Picture it: Newark Liberty International Airport, March 2005. Kamran (he’s six-four and shaves his head, if that helps) and I are hanging about, having just flown in from Austin. We are waiting for the late night departure to Paris, where we will connect to Cairo, and I have had a completely unsatisfying meal at the airport’s Kentucky Fried Taco Hut or somesuch. Miss Anderson Cooper is on the CNN Airport Network (if you haven’t had the pleasure, you’re not missing anything) reporting live from Place des Martyrs in Beirut, where 25,000 angry Lebanese have gathered to demand the pullout of Syrian troops in the wake of that country’s suspected involvement in the assassination of former prime minister Rafiq Hariri. Miss Cooper declares this a populist victory for the region: the beginning of a new chapter. Democracy, he assures us, is on the march in the Middle East.

Kamran, who grew up in Iran around the time of the revolution, and I, who am a completely cynical bastard (tell me you haven’t noticed), look at each other and roll our eyes. What democracy, we wonder out loud, and where exactly is it supposed to be going?

A few months later, Condoleeeeza Rice arrived in Cairo where she met with President Hosni Mubarak (who does not use Grecian Formula 44), and pressed him to “move toward democracy.” I was in Egypt in the summer of 2005 for an extended period, and no one was buying it. What surprised me, since my recollection was of the mid-90s when people just rolled their eyes, shrugged their shoulders and muttered “allahu ‘alam (God knows)” when asked about the nature of public political participation, was that people were actually expressing their lack of faith in the supposedly open-to-competition presidential election scheduled for the fall. In 1995, I watched people go through the motions as the ruling National Democratic Party managed to score a completely unsurprising victory amidst widespread stories of election fraud. Everyone treated it as no big deal – another cross (pardon the Christian-related pun) one had to bear as part of public life.

I hate being right when I’m being pessimistic. Unfortunately, I feel completely justified in expressing surprise two summers ago, because the Egyptians’ newfound confidence in expressing disappointment and frustration with their octagenarian president and his transparent plans to put his son in power once he steps down (or dies in office) has started meeting with resistance.

As I mentioned in an aside a couple of days ago, a judge in Alexandria has taken it upon himself to compile a list of 21 Web sites that he finds objectionable based on their content (specifically, that it’s “insulting to the president” or to the state — legally, there’s not much of a difference between the two). Two Web sites that I follow regularly, The Arabist and 3arabawy, have reported on the latest salvos in the new battle of popular expression versus the thought police in Egypt. They’re not pretty, and the news isn’t encouraging. Last month, an Egyptian blogger was imprisoned for the dual crimes of insulting Islam and President Mubarak in his blog, and, although the case is under appeal, no one seems to be holding their breath that the case being overturned is an imminent possibility.

Egypt receives $2 billion in aid from the U.S. every year, second only to Israel in the amount of scheduled foreign aid, and yet the Bush regime smiles and turns a blind eye because we consider it more acceptable to have a “friendly, secular government” in power in Egypt than to deal with even a moderate Islamist government (because it’s very clear that if government controls on democracy were to magically vanish the Islamists would take power in Egypt). After all, Washington doesn’t like that ‘Islamist’ word. Sounds too much like ‘terrorist’ in most halls of government, the military, and every church in America. Plus, there’s still some people around (Henry Kissinger, clearly enjoying the fruits of his contract with Satan) who remember the Iranian revolution as a “loss” for the United States. After all, Egyptians talk a funny language and practice a weird religion (even the Christians), so no one here particularly minds if they get tortured.

After all of these years, I still find it amazing that our government can be so hypocritical. How can we support democracy in Iraq and yet continue to support repressive regimes elsewhere in the region? And things are getting worse, not better – read the State Department’s Human Rights Report on Egypt — the one that Cairo jumped out of its way to denounce even before the ink was dry. It’s rather sobering. (And then, just for fun, read the one on Saudi Arabia.)

I, of course, take the issue of what’s happening in Egypt to heart because of my own personal interests. I’m sure there are other places in the world where things are worse (Burma, perhaps?), but maybe not on the receiving end of so much foreign aid. We have a leash we could actually yank, and we won’t do it. I could give Washington the benefit of the doubt and say that this is probably because the average Egyptian would feel the effects long before the ruling class, but somehow I doubt that there’s that much foresight involved. After all, it’s much more beneficial for American PR to have Condi posing in her fuck-me boots in the Oriental Hall at AUC and talking about Egypt as a beacon of democratic hope and island of stability … the same language Carter used about Iran in the late 1970s.

Anyway. I’m not really going anywhere with this post at this point, I’m just venting (the two glasses of wine helped). But I’ll give the same answer to anyone who wants to know which side I’m on–Republican or Democrat–when it comes to the issue of foreign policy toward Egypt. My children, when it comes to this issue, I’m on the Egyptians’ side. Just like when it comes to what we’re doing in Iraq, I’m on the Iraqis’ side – remember how we were supposed to be making life better for them?

I think that maybe — just maybe — our fearless leader in Washington has forgotten that this was all supposed to be about someone else. And maybe, for those of us who live in this country, it’s time for us to remind him and all the other folks in Washington who we’re really supposed to be serving. We may have forgotten, but the Egyptians haven’t. The Iraqis haven’t. And if we won’t wake up, they’re gonna remind us. And we’re not going to be happy about it.

And that, dear readers, is enough drunken rambling from yours truly. Happy Wednesday.

 

Blog Theme by LJP & SLR Lounge