Amazon.com Widgets
I’m not mad.  Really.

About Ramblings of a Hopeless Khowaga

Welcome to my Web site. My name is Chris, and I’ll be your host. I live in Austin, Texas, with my partner, Ray, and our child dog, Mocha. You can read more about me, learn 100 random things about me, and if you’re wondering what the heck a khowaga is, click here. Feel free to browse, read, and leave comments!

Tag: ‘jobs’



Of Doors and Windows

Friday, January 8th, 2010

A blanket thanks to everyone who commented or messaged or Facebooked or Twittered (Tweeted?  Twitted?) the past couple of days.

Ray is doing OK — he’s still not entirely sure what to do with himself all day long, but that’s probably to be expected.  On the flip side, he’s giving serious thought to going to school full time this spring semester since he’s pretty close to being able to claim an Associate’s degree–were it not for the fact that two of the classes he has left to take have to be done in sequence, he could knock it out this semester, but even so he can probably have it in hand after the first summer term.  And we’ve done the budget, and things are going to be tight — no more frivolous purchases for a while, but we’re not going to be starving.

He hasn’t quite reached the anger stage yet — I am still expecting to come home one afternoon to find “Death to Dell” splashed on the wall in chocolate syrup.  Seems only fair.

On the way in this morning, I was hearing news about the economic forecast — the recession is slowing down!  Less jobs are being lost!

Is this supposed to be a consolation?  Or am I just finally realizing how full of shit the media is?  And by “Media” I mean “NPR,” since god knows I can’t watch CNN or any of the other major news outlets … and certainly not Fox.  Yes, things are looking up.  Unless you happen to be one of the seven million people who’ve lost their job since this mess started.

I blame the Bush administration.  I don’t know why it’s their fault, but it just is.  Makes me feel better.  Also helps me forget my disillusionment with the Obama administration.

On another note.  If you haven’t been following my 365 project, check it out.  Yesterday’s photo garnered a lot of attention on Flickr, much to my surprise.  The photos that seem to be popular are the ones that I’m putting the least thought into.  What does that say about me?  I wonder.

Anyway.  It’s a cold weekend down here in Texas (it’s currently 24 F, -4 C), and I know we’re still likely better off than most everyone else.  Hope you’re keeping warm!

P.S. And, no, I’m not talking about the game last night.

Sweet Anonymity

Friday, August 7th, 2009

There are times when I wonder if Web 2.0 is taking us to a level of public exposure previously only known to politicians, porn stars, and Madonna.  Thanks to the wonder of Facebook (and, I suppose, Twitter, which I haven’t joined because I’m not vain enough to think anyone is interesting in knowing if I’m standing in line at the grocery store), we now have 24 hour access to deep thoughts.

The question of whether the thoughts are actually deep and may be better left unexpressed is one that I think that some ought to ask themselves (although, in full disclosure, I certainly didn’t ask myself that before I sat down to write this here post).  There are, among my acquaintances, many people who comment on every single thing that their Facebook “friends” do all day long.  Some comments are amusing, others are … well, clearly not as amusing as their authors think they are.

The ubiquity of Facebook, Twitter, and other forms of social networking means that it’s now possible to create an entire online persona that you can drag with you hither and yon.  Your Yahoo! account can be linked to your Flickr, which is now linked to Twitter, and Google now knows more about you than the federal government, and all of them can be linked to Facebook.  Facebook, if you’re not careful, can also track what you buy on Amazon and rent from Blockbuster or Netflix.  This means that if you rate a movie that you rented on Blockbuster, the netsavvier among us can find within a frighteningly short amount of time those embarrassing photos that your coworker took at the office Christmas party of you pretending to be Smiling Bob from the “natural enhancement” commercials.

My friend Michael has pointed out on occasion that there are clearly people with nothing to do all day who lurk about on the InterWebz and leave bizarre comments on any public forum that invites comment.  Austin is a fairly liberal town.  You wouldn’t know this by reading the online edition of our alleged “newspaper” [sic], the Austin American-Statesman (which, on a side note, was up for sale for 18 months and has been taken off the market because no one wanted to buy it).

The Statesman did this weird thing where it invited readers to form their own blogs and comment on the news — it’s to the point where I can’t actually read the online edition anymore.  Global warming is a man-made myth.  The president was born on Mars (funny, I was pretty sure that was a reference to Lady Gaga).  And any time an article pops up about gay … well, gay anything, the Bible thumpers turn up and start screaming about Satan (see: Barack Obama).  Someone actually told Michael to go back where he came from, Commie.

It’s enough to make you want to pull out your old government book and read aloud the definition of “socialism.”  Kids, do you want to know some countries that are socialist?  Norway, Denmark, and Sweden.

I’m guessing this is all because the sane people have day jobs and don’t have time to sit around and write ultra right wing conspiracy shit all over the Internet, let alone create a fake Kenyan birth certificate for the president … and can I just ask — what, exactly, is the birther movement trying to do?  If you don’t like Obama, fine (I’ll admit, the enchantment has worn off for me, too) but for gawd’s sake, why is it necessary to be coming up with all of these ridiculous stories about how he’s not really American?  Are we really supposed to believe that his parents faked his birth certificate in 1961 because they knew that he was going to run for president 48 years later?  Because if they did, I’d like their phone number — I want to run some stock options by them and see which ones they like.

I know, I know: this is America, and we have freedom of speech.  However, just because we have freedom of speech doesn’t mean we should always feel the need to use it.  Sometimes the best thing to do is realize that you don’t have anything important to say … and then not say it.

Like this:

Careful what you wish for

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

The other night, I had one of those “be careful what you wish for” moments. At this point, I suppose there’s no denying that I’m an Internet addict. I’m constantly checking my e-mail (when it works — which it hasn’t been lately — I can even get it on my phone), and whenever we pull into a hotel for the night, I pull out the laptop to see if there’s an Internet connection I can use somewhere. Preferably one I don’t have to pay for.

This recent trip to the Rio Grande Valley was no exception. The hotel in Edinburg was annoying–you actually had to plug your computer into an Ethernet cable. What Luddites!

When I got to Laredo, I was happy to see a wireless connection. I checked my e-mail and then made the usual round of the Web sites I check for updates on an obsessive basis: my blog stats, Facebook, and flickr. The blog stats were unimpressive (not terribly surprising, given that I hadn’t posted anything for a while). Facebook was full of the usual crap: friend requests I’m not sure I want to accept, invitations to events I don’t plan to go to (lately I’ve been invited to an inordinate number of things taking place–usually the next day–in Cairo), and invitations to accept pieces of flair, little fish for my pond, and other random things. (Note to Facebookers: I reject all of these. You can send them if you like, but don’t be insulted if I don’t send them back.)

When I got to flickr, however, there was an update. Two of my photos had been favorited! This makes me happy (for the un-flickr-initiated, that’s what happens when someone decides they really like one of your photos: they can tag it as one of their favorites, which means that they can then access it from their own account any time they want).

Then I saw who had done the favoriting.

I’m sorry to do the bad story teller thing here, but I’m not going to publicly identify the individual in question. I know for a fact that he trolls the Internet looking for people who mention him, the organization he works for, and the Web site that he runs, and I don’t want to do him the service of sending traffic his way, nor do I particularly want him or his minions reading my blog.

What I will tell you is that, in the field I work for, this guy is kind of in the Fred Phelps role. Since 9/11, he’s been one of a handful of neo-conservative nutjobs who’ve decided to use the atmosphere of paranoia, patriotism, and the general political climate of the Bush administration to go after academia. He’s one of those people who thinks that the best way to make sure that university students aren’t being indoctrinated by America-hating liberals is to mandate “balance” in the classroom through legislation. He’s even established an organization dedicated to “improving” my field of study by “restoring balance.” The fact that said organization has, in the five years it’s been operating, never once criticized anyone for being too supportive of his viewpoint (and, trust me, there are plenty of people out there who are) is, of course, completely irrelevant.

For a while, there, they managed to get people in Congress to listen. Among the many things they wanted to do was appoint a “supervisory committee” (which he and his friends expected to be appointed to run) that, when they proposed the idea, would have had the power to go through individual course syllabi and suggest revisions. When nearly every university that receives funding under the federal program in question basically told Congress that they’d rather not accept any more funding than accept such oversight — and, by the way, is this even Constitutional?–things went through various forms of revision until the entire committee idea was dropped altogether. Nowadays, of course, if anyone even brings up this little historical tidbit, it’s because we’re all “hysterical.”

So, I have to admit that when I saw that this particular individual had seen my flickr account and favorited a couple of my photos, my palms got sweaty. I immediately went to my profile. Dear God, I thought, what can he find out about me? Has he seen my blog?

I mentioned this to a couple of friends, and got some sympathetic noises, and I went to bed.

When I woke up in the morning, I did the internet obsession thing again … and then I noticed that, over the course of the night, he had un-favorited my photos.

And I was strangely insulted. So, what, are my photos not good enough for you? Are they too liberal? They’re good photos! Really. (OK, technically, they’re photos of photos hanging in a museum somewhere. Regardless, I did a lot of work touching them up.)

And then I came to the conclusion that I’ve always known was lurking just underneath the surface somewhere: I need help.

… happy Thursday?

Hey, ho, hum

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

I spent the last few days at a conference of my peers, and I probably should be more careful about what I’m going to say, but I don’t want to.

I have a busy month – I will be traveling or working part of every weekend between now and the first weekend in March, and this was the first salvo.  On Sunday, I flew up to an unnamed city in the north.  It doesn’t particularly matter which one it was: as usual, these meetings are held in suburban areas populated by office buildings and chain restaurants.  Except for the trip to and from the airport (which took exactly five minutes and that only because we missed all of the traffic lights), I didn’t go farther than two blocks from the hotel at any point on this trip.

Here’s the way these things work.  You arrive and are escorted to conference registration.  In this case, there was no pre-registration, so for two days we were all walking around with hand-written nametags in a myriad of fluorescent (and frequently unreadable) colors.  Someone in the sponsoring office, a federal agency not known for its sense of humor, had apparently decided to exhibit some personality by buying the pastel colored pack of Sharpie markers.  Note to anyone in the conference planning business: these colors don’t go so well on nametags.

One of the major north/south divides that I have recognized since I moved to Texas from DC has to do with formal attire.  I now chafe at the notion of having to wear a necktie like a ten year old boy in a clip-on.  Northern men love them.  Southern men?  Well, we like not wearing neckties when we can get away with it, and we’re all in favor of considering a nice pair of jeans “formal attire.”  Up north, that doesn’t go over so well. 

And so …

I am firmly of the belief — and in a moment of levity, I actually put this on the evaluation form — that there should be a minimal IQ requirement to attend conferences.  Perhaps that’s a bit extreme.  I think maybe the requirement should be there only if you actually plan to ask a question.

For example: it was revealed that — and, sit down folks, this one’s a shocker — Congress wants to determine whether the money it’s offering up in student aid for foreign language study is actually encouraging students to take jobs where they have to use the foreign language skills that they developed with that aid.  The way some people in the plenary session carried on about this, you’d have thought that Congress wanted to take a sample of each student’s DNA so that they could track their movements by satellite for the rest of their natural life:

*hand goes up*
“Um, so am I to understand that you want us to keep track of these students just because we give them a federally funded scholarship?  Have you considered the privacy violations?  I don’t know if, ethically, I want to be part of this,” said the concerned woman in the front row.

The rest of us rolled our eyes.  You see, what Congress wants is aggregate data: 45% of graduates found relevant employment, 55% did not, or something like that.  There’s no privacy violations in aggregate data.  And, furthermore, we all mumbled to each other, if she didn’t want to be part of it, the rest of us would be more than happy to sacrifice ourselves by taking the money she didn’t want anymore.

Also, we’ve been required to track this stuff for the past fifty years.

Anyway.  I flew back late last night straight into office drama — my favorite.  I had that sort of strange energy today where I was kind of hoping that problem child would engage me directly (all of the drama took place over e-mail), but alas.  The problem child didn’t try to engage me.  I had to be all diplomatic and stuff.  Jeez.

I hope your week is going well!

Cue the eye roll

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

I probably shouldn’t be sharing this story, but I’m gonna anyway.

Today, I closed out a recent job opening on the mainframe — we’ve selected our hire, and this is where you get to go in and check all the boxes on the (in this case) dozens of applicants who weren’t selected. Since we do everything online, it’s literally a point-and-click process to both apply for a job at the university as well as to process the hires and denials. When you officially reject a candidate in the system, it generates an e-mail that serves as the official notification. No fuss, no muss.

One of the things that I can’t stand about e-mail is the ease of response in situations that otherwise would inspire a person to take a moment and consider what they’re doing. Since I was the contact of record, it proceeded to generate an e-mail with my name on it and my e-mail address in the ‘reply-to’ field. When I checked my e-mail tonight, there was a response from one of the applicants.

It said: What a shame, with my name and accomplishments. That’s the entire message, from someone who never even made it to interview.

And I think to myself: How incredibly pompous.

I guess we made the right decision after all.

 

Blog Theme by LJP & SLR Lounge