Amazon.com Widgets
I’m not mad.  Really.

About Ramblings of a Hopeless Khowaga

Welcome to my Web site. My name is Chris, and I’ll be your host. I live in Austin, Texas, with my partner, Ray, and our child dog, Mocha. You can read more about me, learn 100 random things about me, and if you’re wondering what the heck a khowaga is, click here. Feel free to browse, read, and leave comments!

Tag: ‘shoes’



Pain in the Butt

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

Yes, it’s another post surgery post.  Sorry, guys, I’m not really feeling that imaginative lately, but everyone I’ve told the following story has laughed hysterically, so here goes.

The day that I had my surgery–just to refresh, it was gastro-intestinal, and it was the sort of procedure that involves the phrase “go up through” as opposed to “cut into”–the nurse who handled the discharge handed me a massive sheaf of papers that were my “post-care” instructions.  The ones I really cared about were the prescription for painkillers and anti-inflammation drugs.  “Now this,” she said, handing me yet another piece of paper, “is your pharmacy checklist.”

We’ve previously discussed my love of pharmacies.  Moving on.

The list included the usual sorts of things that one would expect for gastro-intestinal surgery: fiber tablets to keep one “regular,” pills to, um, soften things up, pills to unblock things, and then there was an item cryptically labeled “ADR pads.”

“What is an ADR pad?” I asked, innocently.
“It’s like a maxi-pad for your butt.”
“Excuse me?”
“it’s like a maxi-pad, but it’s shaped for the rear portion of your anatomy.”
Blank look.
“Honey, there’s going to be bleeding and discharge.  Do you want that in your drawers?”

“No … ” I said, thinking that I hadn’t quite thought it through when celebrating my big spring cleaning accomplishment of clearing out my underwear drawer of all of the sets of thread-worn undies with holes and failing elastic.  Had I but waited a month …

“So, you’re going to want ADR pads.  And, frankly, if you can’t find those, you can always just”–snicker–”use a straight-up normal maxi-pad like the rest of us.”

Fab-you-luss.

On the way home, we hit the pharmacy and I turned in my prescriptions, and then wandered up and down the aisles looking for the items on my shopping list (seriously, have you seen the price on Metamucil lately??) before finally coming to the last one.  Now, if I were an “ADR pad,” where would I be?

I decided to look in the aisle with the Depends.  After all, nothing screams “embarrassment” like anyone under the age of “still breathing” spending lots of time in the adult diaper section debating the pros and cons of different products:

“This one says it’s for men!”
“Yeah, that’s because they put extra padding in the front.  You need it in the back.”
“You know, I think you can get a little more volume if you speak from the diaphragm.  There may be someone in the produce section who didn’t hear that.”
“You embarrass too easily.”
“If you were in my shoes, would you want people knowing that?”
“No.  But I’m not in your shoes, so it’s funny.”

As I turned around to peruse the other side of the aisle, where the tampons were kept, Ray decided that we had had enough searching on our own and announced that he was going to ask for help.

I followed, hobbling along as quickly as I could.  By the time I got to the counter, he had already managed to flag someone in the pharmacy.

“Do you carry ADR pads?”
“What?” asked the pharmacist.
“ADR pads.”
“They’re–” I started to explain.
“They’re like a tampon, but for your butt,” said my loving partner, who is just too innocent in these matters.  (For my gayboy readers: if you don’t know why this is funny, ask a close female friend, but first make sure that there is no possible way she can file sexual harassment charges against you.)
Off of the pharmacist’s look of pure horror, I said, “No, it’s a pad.”
“Oh,” Ray said, “Is a tampon the one that you–”
“Yes,” I said.  “This is more like a maxi-pad for your butt.”
“For anal leakage,” Ray added.

I’m sure that the pharmacist thought we were putting her on, but just to be certain, the following conversation was had between the pharmacist and her colleague in the back.  Extremely loudly.  The type of loud that you’re pretty sure can be heard in the parking lot.

“Sonia?”
“Yes?”
“Have you ever heard of Anal Leakage Pads?”
“Anal Leakage Pads?  I’ve never heard of such a thing.  What are they for?”
“Well, this gentleman standing right here in front of me is asking about–what are they called?”
“ADR pads,” I said, very meekly and kind of wishing there was something that I could hide behind.
“–ADR pads.  Have you ever heard of those?”
“And they’re for anal leakage?”
“I suppose so.  Yeah, they’re for anal leakage.”
“I don’t think I’ve ever heard of anything like that specifically for anal leakage.  I mean, we have a bunch of absorbent pads, but I don’t know of anything specifically marketed for anal leakage, no.”
“Yeah, I’ve never heard of anything for anal leakage either.  Hey, did you see where he went?”

Retelling this story now … I realize what a fortunate thing it was, indeed, that the anesthetic from the operation was still kind of with me at that point. And no, I will not tell you what I wound up going home with.

And so.

I realized well after the fact that I had completely misheard my surgeon when we were discussing the procedure in the first place.  He had told me that most people only have to take a couple of days off and are back at work in just a few days.  I clearly heard “back at work” as “healed completely,” which is most definitely not the case.

I went back to work on Tuesday of this week, but I’m still hobbling about. I’ve been using my brand new monopod that I bought with the gift certificates I got for my birthday as a cane (haven’t actually used it with my camera yet).  If nothing else, it reminds me to walk slowly.  There are still good days and bad days, but slowly I’m starting to get better.  Which was kind of the purpose in the first place :)

Lifestyles of the Straight and Hopeless

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

I realize that I neglected, in my not-terribly-triumphant announcement that I am returning to blogging more frequently, that I neglected to provide any details about Saturday evening.

Every so often, when I’m out in public, I observe the mating habits of that most intriguing of creatures, homo sapiensis heterosexualis, and I wonder–sometimes to myself, sometimes aloud–how it is that our species has managed to propagate itself as long as it has, given that, well, straight boys are just completely inept. Honestly. The survival of mankind as we know it depends on this??

I should preface this by acknowledging that Ray made what is not an entirely inaccurate observation about me. When I’m out in public, and I see someone who looks young, I tend to comment that they’re “twelve!” Ray gently pointed out that it’s not that they’re getting younger, it’s that I’m getting older. I prefer to think that it’s both, but whatever.

We started Valentine’s Day evening at a local wine bar, Cork and Company, where we had a couple of glasses of wine and some cheese. It was here that I had my first great revelation of the evening: I don’t know anywhere near enough lesbians. I like lesbians. In fact, it’s entirely possible that I enjoy the company of lesbians more than I enjoy the company of many gay men. We were seated at the bar (stupid me: it hadn’t occurred to me to make reservations at the bar that I planned to go to before dinner–this is why I hate Valentine’s Day!) next to a pair of lesbians. I don’t know if they were a couple or not, but they were a hoot to watch. They kept the alcohol coming, and they were no-nonsense, and god help the meandering soul who got a little too close to their space. They even managed to get the bartender to watch their seats for them while they went outside to smoke (Austin’s starting to make California look pro-tobacco).

On the other side of us was a young straight couple (me: “He’s twelve!” Ray: “He’s got three wine glasses in front of him. He’s clearly over 21.” Me: “He can’t possibly be shaving.” Ray: “You do know that he’s two feet away from you and can probably hear every word you’re saying, right?”). In all honesty, these were straight people who were significantly less inept than the others I observed later. She had on a nice dress; he was wearing a suit, and they seemed to be engaging each other in some conversation that prevented him from hearing (or at least acknowledging) the bitterly aging queen sitting next to them.

Then we strolled off to dinner. I had managed to secure late reservations at a Mediterranean restaurant called Taverna. They have a sister branch in Dallas that I’m convinced that I’ve been to, which is more Greek in style. The one in Austin is decidedly Italian. I kind of want to try the one in Houston just to see if it’s Lebanese.

Anyway, Taverna isn’t the cheapest place in town — it’s midrange, and I knew it because when I was spending a lot of Fulbright’s money last summer, I took a group of twenty there for dinner and earned a few frequent flier miles for it. I recalled that we enjoyed the food, and I thought it might be a nice place on Valentine’s Day.

Dirty business first: Ray had the veal parmagiana, I had butternut squash risotto with sea scallops. They were both good. Moving on.

There was another (presumably) gay couple sitting next to us. We decided that we were cuter than they were, and so that was that.

At my eleven o’clock, there was a young Latino couple. (Me: “They’re twelve!” Ray: “They’re not twelve. They have drinks.” Me: “They’re drinking soda.”) He was in a shirt and tie (no jacket), and a pair of loafers that had seen better days. He was slouched so far down in his seat that it was a wonder that he didn’t have to put his plate in his lap in order to eat. She was dolled up in a cute dress. I don’t know what the story was, but I tend to form judgments when, for example, it’s Valentine’s Day and the waiter hands the check to the woman and she pays. That’s just not right.

About halfway through the meal, another couple came in and sat at my nine o’clock. She was wearing a gray dress and had clearly spent hours getting ready. He clearly had not. He was wearing an untucked shirt over a paid of jeans and black athletic shoes. If I were her, I’d have left his sorry ass standing at the door. He spent the whole meal leering at her as if he was just going through the motions so that he could get to the part later where they have sex. Assuming that she didn’t dump him after dinner.

Which, of course, leads to the other thing I find weird about Valentine’s Day. You’re supposed to get dressed up, go out, eat a lot, have dessert, and drinks, and then … who still feels sexy after that? I felt kind of bloated.

But still. Every time I’m out in a formal setting, I tend to look at the straight couples of whom society approves, and I wonder … “How in the name of God have we not died out yet?” Because sometimes … it just doesn’t make that much sense.

Happy. Noo. Year!

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

It’s New Year’s Eve here in the US.  Those of you who are elsewhere in the world (hi Sam!) have probably already experienced the turning of the year, but we’ve still got a few hours left here in the good ol’ Central Time Zone.

I’ve read a number of posts by colleagues, acquaintances and the like that would normally be a year-in-review.  Interestingly enough, a lot of people don’t seem to really want to review the year.  A friend of mine changed her Facebook status a few hours ago.  In Arabic, it directs one of the most hideous insults imaginable (even worse than the flying shoes!) at 2008.

Y’know, that’s pretty much how I feel about it. 2008 had some nice highs, but it also had some really low lows, and I’m not going to lie: I’m pretty much happy to move on to a new calendar and keep on looking forward.

So, here’s a message from me to Old Man 2008:  Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Now that’s something worthy of celebrating :D

For Want of a Shoe

Friday, December 19th, 2008

By now, pretty much everyone on the planet knows about that pair of shoes that were lobbed at the President on his visit to Iraq last week. I’m not going to comment on the propriety of throwing shoes at world leaders, nor on the (apparently poor) aiming skills of certain Iraqi journalists.

I’m going to bitch about the media.

I went to a party the evening it happened, and overheard an acquaintance telling another partygoer, “You know, they said on the news that in their culture, throwing a shoe is the worst insult imaginable.” Realizing that I was nearby, heads turned to me. “Chris, you know those people. Is that true?”

Now, I don’t mean to be awful here, but can we step outside of the box for a second? The media did, for a bit, wet themselves in an attempt to get self-proclaimed culture experts in to discuss the seriousness of the incident as it is reflected in Arab culture. In fact, I witnessed a similar conversation here between two faculty members. “I just don’t think people understand how serious it is,” one of them lamented.

Here’s where Chris would like to offer some “get real” commentary:

The man threw a shoe at the President of the United States, arguably the most powerful man on earth. Who in their right mind would have watched CNN and thought to themselves, “Hmmm. I wonder if that’s some sort of greeting? Maybe it’s a benediction. Yeah, that’s it! I’ll bet that in Iraq people throw shoes as a way to make people feel welcome! Wait, here’s a culture expert … it’s an insult? They insulted my president? I never would have known that! Thank you, Fuad Ajami, for clearing that right up for me! I was about to go throw my shoes at my new Arab neighbors to make them feel welcome, but thanks to your two-bit commentary I know better! Man, that was close!”

Yes, throwing shoes is an insult in Arab culture, as is pointing the soles of your feet at people, but, really. Are we so clueless without the news media that we have to have someone explain the implications at us?

Fortunately, more serious things have come up in the media, such as a lively debate on the gender of Santa’s reindeer.

Times like these … I kinda wonder if the Unabomber had a point …

Rising to the Challenge

Saturday, October 18th, 2008

Sam memed me.  What the heck, I was feeling short on inspiration.  I’ll deal with the psychological ramifications of responding to a challenge from a lad nearly half my age in therapy  :)

The challenge is simple: you’re supposed to list five things you’re addicted to.  

#1.  The Internet.

This one goes right at the very top of the list.  I’d never heard of the Internet when I first got to university and my World Politics TA, whose name I do remember but won’t list here, made us all learn how to use something called “e-mail.”  I learned how to use “e-mail” in October, but didn’t actually know anyone else who had it until the following spring.  

Nowadays, I get e-mail on my cell phone.  I actually find this annoying, because I don’t always want to have e-mail coming in on my telephone, especially on weekends off.  You can tell I find this annoying when I take my phone out of my pocket every time it gives that specific shudder vibration that indicates a new message has come in.

My mail is online, my photos are online, I’m connected to half of the known universe by blog, facebook, and flickr.  Friend me!

Yeah, I definitely think that qualifies as an addiction.

 

#2.  Shoes.

My name is Chris, and I’m a shoe whore.

I think I’ve admitted this before — I seem to recall having a length discussion about Danny’s inner Aztec goddess who threatened to eat his still beating heart right out of his chest if he didn’t purchase a pair of shoes.

I don’t actually buy shoes that often, but I have been known to purchase a pair and get home only to realize that I already own them (fortunately on all occasions I’ve been able to add “in another color.”)  The shoe section of our closet — which is far too small–is overrun.

 

#3.  Books.

“You know, you can get those for free at the library,” my mother is fond of saying, every time she comes over and sees the bookshelves.  She’s so not an addict.  The first time as an undergrad that I walked into a professor’s office and saw every wall lined with shelves sagging under the weight of books crammed in every which way, I thought, “I’m not alone!”

At this point, I have most of my academic books at work and my fun trashy books at home.  I’m starting to grow short on space for books at work, though, because I spend part of my budget on books for research. Granted, I haven’t picked up David Cook’s Martyrdom in Islam yet (I really can’t for thelife of me remember what I was doing that I thought it would be useful), but some of the others–Desiring Arabs, Ornament of the World, Muslins in Spain 1492-1611–I have devoured as quickly as humanly possible.  Hey, I’m a history geek.  I like this stuff.

At home, on the other hand, I’ve got The Devil Wears Prada on my night stand.  Granted, at the moment, I’m reading a trashy Egyptian novel by an author you probably haven’t heard of, but trust me: it’s trashy.

 

#4.  Food.

I know, we all need food to live.  If I’m an addict, we all are, right?

Well, here’s the thing.  There’s food, and then there’s food.  I am loathe to refer to myself as a “foodie” because a former coworker used to proudly call herself that.  Mainly, I think it was so that she could excuse her own bizarre tastes and self-diagnosed food allergies under a mask of snobbishness (“I’m a foodie” sounds so much better than “Eating onions gives me explosive diarrhea”).

Natalie’s friend Jacques–the one who took us to Teotihuacan and then out to dinner with his partner where I learned many interesting Spanish words–asked me if I was a foodie, and I said, “I wouldn’t say that I’m a foodie.  I just enjoy eating.”

“Well,” he said, “That’s what being a foodie is.”

So maybe I am a foodie.  I don’t know.  I like trying new recipes in my kitchen, and I like trying new foods when I go out.  Our pantry is stocked with spices I’ve only used a handful of times, and on very rare occasions we have to have a grilled cheese sandwich for dinner because a recipe I’ve tried has turned out very, very, very badly. 

But at least we tried it.  ;)

 

#5.  Photography.

I dithered about putting this one up here.  Am I trying to sound cool?  I wonder.  Then I think about all of the meetings and places that I have wandered into with my camera to the consternation of colleagues, my parents, my boyfriend, and people who have decided to just pretend they don’t know who I am.  I’m usually gracious enough to respond positively when they ask if they can have some of the photos later.

I don’t tend to take a lot of photos at home (although I think Ray would dispute that).  When I’m traveling, however, my camera is always with me.  Always.  We can be just going to dinner, and I’ll bring it along.  Something might happen that I’ll want a photo of!  When Natalie and I went to Puebla, I didn’t bring my camera to dinner and missed getting a photo of the chiles en nogada that we had for dinner the night we arrived.  I may never forgive myself.  We were seriously tempted to have them again just so that I could have the chance.

As much as I’m addicted to photography–and believe you me, when the Adorama weekly specials arrive in my inbox or the quarterly B&H catalog arrives in the mail, it’s like pornography–I still question whether or not I’m a decent photographer.  I’ve taken my share of decent photos, some of which I’ve liked enough to put on the wall in my office or at home.  But then I look at the photos of the pros–some of whom are barely out of high school!–and I feel inadequate. 

And then I pick up my camera and keep trying.

 

I think at the end of this, I’m supposed to tag others for the meme, but I don’t like doing that.  So, here’s the thing: if you do this, leave a message and link in the comments so I can keep track!

 

Blog Theme by LJP & SLR Lounge